Media Releases
AFTA Seeks A regional solution to the Asylum Seekers issue PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 30 July 2010 00:00

Letter to Senator Bob Brown - Now Released to the Media  29 July 2010

 

Re: A regional solution to the Asylum Seekers issue

 

Hon Senator Bob Brown

Leader of the Australian Greens

GPO Box 404

Hobart TAS 7001

 

Dear Senator Brown

 

Re: A regional solution to the Asylum Seekers issue

 

The Australasian Federation of Tamil Associations (AFTA), the umbrella body of the peak Tamil organizations in Australia and New Zealand would like to bring to your attention our deep concerns over the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal-National Coalition using the asylum seekers issue for their electoral gains at the forthcoming election. AFTA time and again had appealed to both parties to take a bi-partisan approach on this very sensitive matter.

 

Since the Australian Greens have always taken a principled and humanitarian approach to this issue, we seek your help to inform the Australian public of the true nature of this problem addressing the;

  • humanitarian plight and the desperate state of the ‘boat people’,
  • need to remove the root causes,
  • arrival of more asylum seekers by air than sea and
  • the wider global and regional context including Australia’s obligations under the refugee convention.

As you are well aware, the “Boat People” issue was brought into electoral politics by the former Prime Minister John Howard using the Tampa crisis to win votes in the parliamentary elections.  Since then both sides of politics have been trying hard to keep this issue as a burning issue in this country.

 

Howard government introduced the “Off-Shore Processing” (OSP), and “Temporary Protection Visa” (TPV), the “Pacific Solution”, and won an election essentially on this issue.  Rudd government came into power promising to abolish the “Pacific Solution” and kept the promise and introduced Permanent Protection Visa and opened up the Christmas Island Processing Centre. 

 

Whether it was the “Pull Factor” or “Push Factor” that was responsible, which is debatable, boat people started to flood our waters and the “People Smugglers” are still feasting on the desperation of these victims of war.  When the opposition used this opportunity to attack the Rudd government’s policy, sighting the increased boat arrivals, instead of trying to use a humanitarian and bi-partisan approach, Rudd government panicked and started to defend its policy.

 

This has once again paved the way for a serious issue such as this to become an

 

election issue, parading as who is strong on “Border Protection’’. Protecting the borders from whom?  Protecting from the innocent refugees or people smugglers?

 

Well before the federal election was announced, anticipating the potential for this issue to become a hot election issue, AFTA proposed in a DFAT - Tamil Diaspora Forum, held in Canberra on 22.04.10 and chaired by Mr David Holly the Assistant Secretary, South and West Asia Branch, that only a regional approach could solve this problem. A regional solution, similar to the one previously used by our regional neighbors to handle the Indo Chinese boat people. Assistant Director General, North and South Asia Section of the Australian Agency for International Development and a senior official from the Department of Immigration and Citizenship at a similar level also were assisting Mr Holly at this forum. A copy of the presentation is attached for your information.

 

When Julia Gillard became the Prime Minister and announced a “Regional Solution”, initially we thought that she had embraced a genuine regional approach. But soon to our disappointment her “East Timor Regional Solution” resembled John Howard’s “Pacific Solution”. Under both schemes the asylum seekers are kept under detention off-shore and the only difference in the Gillard proposal would be, the issue of permanent protection visas to the persons found to be genuine refugees instead of the temporary protection visas issued under the previous “Pacific Solution”.

 

Dear Senator, as you very well know, in 2009 the asylum seekers handled between Australia and New Zealand constitute less than 2% (6500 out of 377,200) of the world asylum seeker population. If this number is a burden on Australia, we should consider sharing the refugees with other willing nations in the region or beyond. But a more effective approach would be to stem the flow at source. For example, if Australia can collectively with other democratic nations use diplomatic means to restore democracy, rule of law and normalcy and help find a political solution to the legitimate grievances of the Tamil people in Sri Lanka, the Tamils will stop fleeing to Malaysia from where they seem to take off in leaky boats to Australia via Indonesia.

 

Concept of Regional Processing Centres

When the Indo-Chinese boats started to arrive in the region by early 1979 it became apparent that Malaysia (the main first asylum country), having taken a heavy burden upon itself, allowed asylum seekers to flee in boats to the neighbouring countries. Indonesia’s then Foreign Minister Mochtar Kusumaatmadja proposed a safer alternative in the form of a “Regional Processing Centre” (RPC).  The basic idea of RPC was to relieve the burdens of overcrowded first asylum countries by removing some of their refugee population to another site in the region where UNHCR could complete their processing for permanent resettlement in a third country. 

 

After Indonesia and Philippines made their commitments in an ASEAN ministerial meeting in Bali in August 1980, UNHCR had a RPC operating on the Indonesian island of Galang in the Riau Archipelago at a cost of $7 million. “Philippine Refugee Processing Centre” in Morong Bataan was also established at the same time by UNHCR.  Both these UNHCR processing centres processed more than 395,000 Indo Chinese refugees and resettled in countries like USA, Canada, France and Australia over a period of 14 years.  Out of the more than 90,000 Indo-Chinese refugees resettled in Australia more than 36,000 came out of these two camps.

 

If Australia feels, as it is being portrayed in the election campaign, that it is facing the same situation as Malaysia faced in 1970s, the best way to handle this problem is to establish a real “Regional Processing Centre” similar to the Galang one or Morong Bataan one, and resettle the eligible refugees in the same countries where Indo-Chinese refugees were resettled. 

 

This is not an issue to be discussed at the Pacific Islands Forum as our Foreign Minister has suggested lately, as it is not a problem of the Pacific region but it is a problem for the Asia - Pacific region. The only country affected in the Pacific Region is Australia.  The Source countries – Sri Lanka & Afghanistan, Country of First Asylum – Malaysia, Transit countries – Indonesia and Thailand, Target country of arrival – Australia and the countries of resettlement – USA, Canada, France, UK, Australia and New Zealand have to be involved in making a decision to establish such a RPC.  Since all these countries are part of the Bali Process, it is the most suitable forum to take up this issue.  To take a humanitarian approach like this to solve this problem, we need bipartisan support from both sides of politics in Australia. 

 

What can the Australian Greens do?

AFTA strongly feels that, the Australian Greens who have the potential to hold the balance of power in the next parliament, should inform the Australian public of the issues raised above and announce that it would advocate for Australia’s genuine effort to end the political crisis in the source countries to stem the flow at source and to take a well coordinated regional approach to process the claims of the asylum seekers fleeing in the meantime.

 

This approach from the Australian Greens in our view will help effectively remove the asylum seeker issue from the election agenda of both the ALP and the Liberal-National Coalition parties.

We eagerly await your response to this request and any possible swift action on this.

 

 

Yours truly,

 

 

Dr. Victor Rajakulendran

Secretary

Mob: 0402 484 209

 

29.07.2010

 

CC:

 

  • Hon Stephen Smith MP, Minister for Foreign Affairs & Trade

  • Hon Julie Bishop MP, Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs

  • Hon Senator Chris Evans, Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

  •  Hon Scot Morrison MP, Shadow Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

 

Media Enquiries:
Sydney: Dr. Victor Rajakulendran 0402 484 209
Melbourne: Mr. Siva Sivakumar 0404 894 591
Queensland: Prof. Selva Selvanathan 0402 960 439
Auckland: Dr. Siva Vasanthan 021 023 51 007

 

Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Web:   www.tamil.org.au

Last Updated on Wednesday, 04 August 2010 10:00
 
Hon Julie Bishop, Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs meets AFTA PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 30 July 2010 00:00

Hon Julie Bishop, Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs meets AFTA

Hon Julie Bishop, Deputy Leader of the Opposition and the Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs, when she was in Sydney on her campaign trail, invited AFTA for a dialogue.

 

Hon Julie Bishop and Julie Marcus MP with AFTA Secretary Dr Rajakulendran

 

Dr. Victor Rajakulendran, the Secretary of AFTA met her on Friday the 30th of July at MP for Greenway, Hon. Louise Markus's office. Since AFTA has written to Sen. Bob Brown, the Leader of the Greens with a copy to Julie Bishop and others, about a Regional Solution to the Assylum Seekers issue, the discussion was mainly on this and the situation in Tamil areas of Sri Lanka in general.  Ms Bishop argued that Nauru Solution as the liberal party's prefered option and asked Victor to explain AFTA's Regional Solution. Although she agrees that AFTA's Regional Solution as a long term solution she maintained that Nauru Solution as the best option at the moment.  As there was not enough time to have a full discussion on the matter, Ms Bishop departed with the message that she will have a cordial relationship with the Tamils if she becomes the Foreign Minister.

 

Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Web:   www.tamil.org.au

 

 

 

Last Updated on Tuesday, 03 August 2010 22:43
 
Dr. Palitha Kohan, a war crime suspect is appointed by the UN to investigate Human Rights Violations PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 11 June 2010 00:00

Media Release                                       11 June 2010

 

Is it not an irony? Dr. Palitha Kohan, a war crime suspect is appointed by the UN to investigate Human Rights Violations by Israel!

 

The Australasian Federation of Tamil Associations (AFTA), the umbrella body of the peak Tamil associations in Australia and New Zealand, is outraged by the appointment of Dr. Palitha Kohona by the UN [an ex-official of the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), a former Australian Diplomat at UN and current Sri Lanka’s permanent representative at the UN] to investigating the human rights violation charges against Israel.  It is now well documented that Dr Palitha Kohona was involved in the alleged war crime committed by the Sri Lankan Forces in the Tamil Homeland of Sri Lanka during the last days of the war between Sri Lanka and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) during May 2009.

 

It has been announced that he will lead a special team to Egypt, Jordan and Syria from 08 to 19 of June.  Other members of the Special Committee to investigate Israeli practices affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories are from Malaysia and Senegal.  Since its establishment in 1968, the committee has not been allowed by Israel to visit the Palestine’s occupied territories.

 

Dr. Palitha Kohona, who was the Sri Lankan foreign secretary during the last phase of the brutal war in Sri Lanka , has been the Sri Lankan government’s point man in the negotiations with the LTTE in drawing up modalities for the surrender of  two LTTE political leaders..  He had told the media at that time that he had received a number of messages indicating that Mr. Nadesan and Mr. Pulidevan the 2 LTTE political leaders (whom he has met at various peace talks initiated by Norway) wanted to surrender. It is understood that a number of these messages were delivered from an European NGO with a history of working in northern Sri Lanka. Dr Kohona had told the media that his response had been that "there was only one way to surrender that is recognized by military practice". He said they should obtain a white flag and give themselves up. "I kept saying this for three days," he added.  Dr Kohona even produced a text message stored on his phone then which he had sent to the NGO at that time in response to a question from the NGO on their safety. According to the journalist, the message read: "Just walk across to the troops, slowly! With a white flag and comply with instructions carefully. The soldiers are nervous about suicide bombers."  However the soldiers shot and killed not only these two leaders but several others who came with them to surrender.  This is an obvious “war crime” committed in that war zone where Dr. Kohana has been directly involved.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/tamil-leaders-killed-as-they-tried-to-surrender-1687790.html

 

Dr Kohona, is implicated in this internationally unacceptable criminal act that still has many questions unanswered.  As such it is highly questionable that he could be allowed to, not only participate, but lead an investigating team into Israel’s human rights violation.  While the UN is contemplating a full scale investigation into Sri Lanka’s conduct of the war in 2009 and its human rights violations, it is ludicrous that its former Foreign Secretary should be appointed to investigate human rights violation charges against Israel. In rejecting calls for international investigation into credible allegations of violations of international humanitarian and human rights law by senior government leaders during the last stages of the war in Sri Lanka, Dr Kohona told Matt Wade of SMH, “Some people desperately keep on scratching that old wound so that it stays open. Instead of helping us to heal the wounds and move forward, they suffer from a one-size-fits-all approach to international conflict.”

 

AFTA calls on the International Community, particularly the Australian and New Zealand governments, to express their concerns and reservation on UN’s inclusion of Dr. Palitha Kohona in this Special Committee investigating Israeli practices affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian people.

 

AFTA also urges all Independent Media to question Dr. Palitha Kohona’s suitability to carry out the tasks UN has appointed him to do.

 

Media Enquiries:
Sydney: Dr. Victor Rajakulendran 0402 484 209
Melbourne: Mr. Siva Sivakumar 0404 894 591
Queensland: Prof. Selva Selvanathan 0402 960 439
Auckland: Dr. Siva Vasanthan 021 023 51 007

 

 

 

Last Updated on Thursday, 10 June 2010 23:27
 
PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 21 September 2009 11:26

Senator the Hon. Chris Evans

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600

 

Dear Hon. Minister

 

Re: Request for special consideration for relatives of Tamil Australians for migration and extension of student visas for Tamil students

 

As the peak body representing the Tamil Australians living in Australia, the Australasian Federation of Tamil Associations (AFTA) would like to seek your urgent attention to the need for Australia to consider allowing relatives of them in Sri Lanka who were directly affected by the recent military onslaught and the status of the Tamil students currently pursuing studies in Australia.

 

As you are well aware, many Tamil Australians have lost their relatives in the battle that went on for few months until May 19th 2009.  Now relatives of many Tamil Australians are languishing in detention camps surrounded by barbed wire fence. Sri Lanka calls these camps “Welfare Villages” and the media describe these as “Concentration Camps”.  Inmates of these camps are not allowed to get out of the camps and it is extremely difficult for relatives from outside to gain access to meet the inmates.  These inmates are living in overcrowded temporary shelters with inadequate medical and sanitary facilities. Media reports suggest that 20-30 youth from these camps are being taken away by the Sri Lankan security forces daily with their fate not known.

 

Australian government could help the relatives of the Tamil Australians who are languishing in these camps, if these people are allowed to join their relatives in Australia under an accelerated special family reunion program on humanitarian grounds.  It is noted with appreciation that the Canadian government has already embarked on such a program.

 

AFTA also has come to realise that many overseas Tamil students who are already studying in Australia are finding difficult to extend their Visas or apply for residency upon completion of their studies due to the difficulty in obtaining appropriate police clearance if they are from the conflict zone.  AFTA will appreciate if special exemptions are made in these cases in the interim until situation returns to normal in those areas.

 

AFTA appeals to you to consider the above requests favourably and expeditiously.

 

Yours truly,

 

 

Dr. Raga Ragavan
Chairperson
Australasian Federation of Tamil Associations

 

Mobile : 0402387920

 

1 July 2009                                                         

 

Copy: Hon. Stephen Smith MP - Minister for Foreign Affairs